AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Better than inkscape for mac12/28/2023 ![]() the absolute coordinates range from (-50,-50) to (50,50). The origin (0,0) is in the centre of the 100mm x 100mm engraving area.This extension warns if the target graphics are larger than 100mm x 100mm, and you should scale it down and try again.Engraving area is limited to 100mm x 100mm in size.(0=off, which makes the Gcode useless, so I disallowed it.) Laser power can be set from 1 (min) to 255 (max).I tested speeds from 0.01 to 70mm/min and they all came out the same on the engraver end. Lowest laser speed is limited to 70mm/min, as this is the lowest effective speed that LaserPecker App allows.Laser head idle movement speed is hard-coded to 3000mm/min, as this is what's used in LaserPecker's official sample Gcode files.Restart Inkscape and you should be able to access the extension from Extensions > LaserPecker > Gcode Generator for L1/Pro/L2.For Windows: C:\Program Files\Inkscape\share\inkscape\extensions\.For Mac: Launch Inkscape > Preferences > System > Look for User extensions > click Open.For Linux: ~/.config/inkscape/extensions/.Depending on your Inkscape version and operating system, download laserpecker.inx and laserpecker.py from extension/ / directory into.Install Inkscape v0.92 or newer and watch this video on how to download a file from GitHub.This extension has been tested with LaserPecker L1, Pro and LP2. LaserPecker is a brand of affordable and portable consumer level laser engravers.įor more details, visit their official English site or Chinese site. This extension allows you to manually set power and speed beyond the App's limitations with Gcode values. The LaserPecker App has a built-in Gcode converter with capability of line-filling, which is pretty easy to use. This is a Gcode generator extension for Inkscape, tailored for LaserPecker L1, Pro and LP2. But I sure wouldn't consider it for high-end work.中文介绍点此处 LaserPecker Extension for Inkscape ![]() I did nice stuff with Illustrator way back in 2000, on machines that ran slower than a modern box would after the additional overhead of running compiled JS in a neutered web browser. You could probably edit moderately complex files with a theoretical vector package working under the handicap of being interpreted JS running in a neutered web browser. in general there's a lot of ways to send performance over a cliff by making the program generate a hell of a lot of shapes from simple rules - scatter brushes deposit a lot of copies of a shape along the path you draw, art brushes distort a shape along your drawn path, you can generate multiple paths with various programmatic effects applied to them from a single path. also you can do some really terrible things to Illustrator's performance very quickly by applying a distortion mesh to a shape with a pattern fill that contains a lot of copies of its patternĥ. a few large bitmap effects at 300dpi can very quickly bring IllustratorI to its knees, I'm not sure if this is due to using up tons of memory, unoptimized image convolution routines, or simply having to grovel through a lot of data.Ĥ. in the middle of a very large and complex list of items, or whatģ. adding new objects to a complex file starts getting super slow (somewhere around 4-5000 paths, less if you're generating lots of virtual paths via various effects) - I'm not sure if this is due to running out of physical memory, or trying to insert new items. lots of transparency with the GPU acceleration on - it very quickly becomes an order of magnitude slower than the CPU renderer, especially if you do tricks to generate 3-4 translucent shapes from every path you draw by hand like I do nowadaysĢ. My experience with many years of pushing Illustrator's limits is that the big performance hits are:ġ. That doesn't make it a great fit here, but I'm happy to be surprised. There are some definite value wins in that space. I don't think Chrome, JS, Node or Electron are going anywhere any time soon. Many electron apps just aren't that well written, and not to besmirch any developers working in other toolkits, making good JS code in a larger codebase is a different kind of skill than most are used to, beyond this, the techniques and approaches for performance gains are also fairly different. I know that using it for heavy filters on raster art would be too slow comparatively for many.įrankly, VS Code is probably the only moderately complex application that really shows off Electron. ![]() I'm not sure a vector graphics program is a good fit or not, or where the edges in performance may be. beyond this, even as a big fan of Electron based applications, for a lot of things, it's not a great fit for a many things. I think the downvotes are partly because of your "Cue the downvotes" at the beginning.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |